Kompatibilitas Konsep Sustainable Development pada Laporan Corporate Social Responsibility
Compatibility of Sustainable Development Concept in Corporate Social Responsibility Report
Intrinsic aspect that is owned by internal management on policies related to the corporation social responsibility (CSR) program leads to the results the company wants to achieve their purposes. Based on the context of intrinsic factors, this study intends to explore facts from the internal management of a company regarding the compatible concept for sustainable development (SD) as company achievements on CSR as a program that is run by the company. This research was conducted with a qualitative approach and strengthened by a triangulation process with supporting data from the company's Sustainability Report (SR). Monetary quantity parameter or economy aspect of corporate wealth (such as tangible assets be classified as internal features or extrinsic factor) have relatable impact to sustainable development (SD), with semantic analysis method revealed intrinsic factor have not it. The contribution to outcomes is to create a conceptual framework for categories associated with sustainable development through the CSR program that is required by the government for companies to implement in Indonesia. The implication of the research is found the CSR reporting supporting economic aspect, strengthen sustainable development in practices.
Agbejule, A. 2011. Organizational Culture and Perfomrmance: The Role of Management Accounting System. Journal of Applied Accounting Research12.Pp.74–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09675421111130621
Aldama, LR. P., Amar, PA., Trostianki, DW. 2014. Embedding Corporate Responsibility Through Effective Organizational Structures. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 9. Pp.506–516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700910985043
Barthes, R. 1994. The Kitchen of Meaning. The Semiotic Challenge.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press Pp. 157-9 (translated by Richard Howard).
Burritt, R. L.2012. Environmental Performance Accountability: Planet, People, Profits. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 25. Pp.370–405.doi: 10.1108/09513571211198791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571211198791
Frankel, R., C.M.C. Lee.1998. Accounting Valuation, Market Expectation and Cross-Sectional Stock Return. Journal of Accounting and Economic 25. Pp. 283- 319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00026-3
Galant, A., Cadez, S.2017. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance Relationship: A Review Of Measurement Approaches. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 30, 676-693. doi:10.1080/1331677X.2017.1313122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1313122
Hopper, T., Lassou, P., & Soobaroyen, T. (2017). Globalisation, accounting and developing countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.06.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.06.003
Husser, J., Irgo, M. I. V, Andre, J., Barbat, G. 2012. CSR And Sustainable Development : Are The Concepts Compatible ? Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 23. Pp. 658–672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14777831211262936
Joana S, Pedro N. 2015. When Corporate Social Responsibility Increases Performance: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic CSR Attribution, Business Ethics A European Review 24. Pp. 111-124. doi.org/10.1111/beer.12084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12084
Malleri JC. 1991. Semantic Content Analysis: A New Methodology for The Relatus Natural Language Environment, in in Articial Intel ligence and International Politics, editor, Valerie M. Hudson. Boulder: Westview Press.
Mistry, V., Sharma, U., Low, M. 2014. Management Accountants’ Perception of Their Role in Accounting for Sustainable Development: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Global Mobility 2. Pp, 343–374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-06-2013-0052
Saldana, J. 2009. An Introduction to Codes and Coding. In The Coding Manual
For Qualitative Researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Sholihin M., Madein A.2015. The Impact of Social and Environmental Information on Managers’ Decisions: Experimental Evidence from Indonesia. Asian Review of Accounting June 32. Pp.156 - 169. doi:10.1108/ARA-11-2013-0074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-11-2013-0074
Yammeesri, J., Herath, S.K. 2010. Board Characteristics And Corporate Value: Evidence from Thailand” International Corporate Governance. The International Journal of Business in Society 10. Pp. 279-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701011051910
Yuanita, N. (2015). Key Policies for Sustainable Finance Indonesia Financial Services Authority ( OJK ). Rapat Sosialisasi Industri KLembaga Keuangan dan Perbankan.
Yuliarini, S., Othman, Z., Nor, K., & Ismail, I. 2017. Environmental Accounting Practices : A Regulatory and Internal Management Perspective. Journal of Ecconomic & Financial Studies 5. Pp. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18533/jefs.v5i3.267
UNEP Inquiry. (2017). Green Finance Progress Report, (July). Retrieved from http://unepinquiry.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Green_Finance_Progress_Report_2017.pdf
Copyright (c) 2022 Sarah Yuliarini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.