The Role of Innovation Strategy Mediation in Rivalry Relationships with the Organizational Performance
Peran Mediasi Strategi Inovasi dalam Hubungan Rivalitas terhadap Kinerja Organisasi Perguruan Tinggi
-
(1) * Heri Widodo
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Indonesia
(2) Bambang Tjahjadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Indonesia
(3) Basuki Basuki Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This research is expected to prove that the innovation strategy mediates the effect of the level of rivalry on organizational performance at the Muhammadiyah 'Aisyiyah College (PTMA). The population in this study were all active Muhammadiyah 'Aisyiyah Universities (PTMA) in Indonesia, as many as 164 PTMAs consisting of universities, high schools, polytechnics, institutes, and academies. Samples were taken as many as 70 PTMA with the technique of determining the sample used was random sampling. The data analysis techniques used were Common Method Biases (CMB) and Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results of the study prove that the Innovation Strategy is able to mediate the effect of rivalry on organizational performance. PTMA's ability to adapt as well as the ability to choose strategies will be a determining factor in maintaining and improving operational sustainability, competitiveness and improving PTMA organizational performance. The innovation strategy used in this research is an IT-based academic program strategy, the development of open learning through SiberMu, or a merger policy between PTMA. The results of this study provide empirical evidence on the Industrial Organizational (I/O) theory, which is related to the level of competition. Rivalry mediated by innovation strategies can improve organizational performance. The results of this study indicate that the increase in organizational performance will be influenced by the external conditions of the organization, namely rivalry. The results of this research are practically expected to contribute to policy and strategy development for PTMA leaders in facing the Industrial Revolution 4.0 era.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Abdillah, W., & Hartono, J. 2015. Partial Least Square (PLS) Alternatif Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Dalam Penelitian Bisnis (1 Ed.). ANDI.
Ahmad, I. 2018a, Januari 17. Proses Pembelajaran Digital Dalam Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Direktur Jenderal Pembelajaran Dan Kemahasiswaan Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Tinggi, Medan.
Ahmad, I. 2018b, Februari 16. Pendidikantinggi “4.0” Yang Mampu Meningkatkan Daya Saing Bangsa. Direktur Jenderal Pembelajaran Dan Kemahasiswaan Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Tinggi, Makasar. Http://Lib.Um.Ac.Id/Wp-Content/Uploads/2018/03/Presentasi-Intan-Ahmad.Pdf
Al-Husseini, S. J. H. 2014. The Impact Of Leadership Style On Innovation In Iraq’s Higher Education Institutions: The Role Of Knowledge Sharing. University Of Plymouth.
Aoun, J. E. 2017. Robot-Proof Higher Education In The Age Of Artificial Intelligence. The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11456.001.0001
Appe, J. 2018. Peran Perguruan Tinggi Dan Lembaga Litbang Dalam Menyongsong Pengembangan Inovasi Menuju Era Industri 4.0.
A.R. Fakhrudin. 1985. Muhammadiyah Menuju Masa Mendatang, Yogyakarta. Persatuan.
Asif, M., & Searcy, C. 2013. A Composite Index For Measuring Performance In Higher Education Institutions. 19.
Aswani, S. 2013. Strategic Innovation And Performance Of Public Universities In Kenya.
Azar, G., & Ciabuschi, F. 2017. Organizational Innovation, Technological Innovation, And Export Performance: The Effects Of Innovation Radicalness And Extensiveness. International Business Review, 26, 324–336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.09.002
Ball, R., & Wilkinson, R. 1994. The use and abuse of performance indicators in UK higher education. Higher Education, 27(4), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384902
Carmona, M., & Sieh, L. 2004. Measuring Quality in Planning: Managing the Performance Process. Publisher: Taylor & Francis, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203563311
Cave, M., Hanney, S., Kogan, M., & Trevett, G. 1988. The Use of Performative Indicators in Higher Education. A Critical Analysis of Developing Practice. Jessica Kingsley, London.
Damanpour, F. 1991. Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590. https://doi.org/10.5465/256406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256406
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. 2009. Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 495–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun021
Darroch, J. 2005. Knowledge Management, Innovation And Firm Performance. Journal Of Knowledge Management, 9, 101–115. Https://Doi.Org/10.1108/13673270510602809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510602809
Direktorat Sistem Inovasi. 2018. Panduan Umum Peyelenggaraan Manajemen Inovasi Perguruan Tinggi. Direktorat Sistem Inovasi, Direktorat Jenderal Penguatan Inovasi Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Tinggi.
Drucker, P. F. 2015. Innovation And Entrepreneurship. Routledge Classic. London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315747453
Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. 2004. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, USA.
Gogan, L. M., Artene, A., Sarca, I., & Draghici, A. 2016. The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Organizational Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221, 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.106
Hamid, E. S. 2018. Peluang Dan Tantangan Perguruan Tinggi Pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2018i5.4420
Jakovljevic, M. 2018. A Model For Innovation In Higher Education. South African Journal Of Higher Education, 32, 109–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/32-4-2432
Juneman. 2013. Common Method Variance & Bias Dalam Penelitian Psikologis. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(5), 364–381.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. 1992. The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review 70.
Li, S., & Liu, B. 2018. Joseph E. Aoun: Robot-Proof: Higher Education In The Age Of Artificial Intelligence: MIT Press, 2017. Kindle Edition. Higher Education, 77. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10734-018-0289-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0289-3
Lukman, R, Krajnc, D, & Glavic, P. 2010. University Ranking Using Research, Educational And Environmental Indicators. Journal Of Cleaner Production, Vol. 18(No. 7), 619-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.015
Mirfani, A. M., Sutarsih, C., & Rosalin, E. 2012. Strategi Dan Hasil Kompetisi Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, XIV(1).
Na’im, A. 2017. Menghadapi Perekonomian Baru. Kementerian Riset Teknologi Dan Pendidikan Tinggi.
Nasir, M. 2018a. Pengembangan Iptek Dan Pendidikan Tinggi Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Kementerian Riset, Teknologi Dan Pendidikan Tinggi. Http://Www.Kopertis6.Or.Id/Component/Content/Article/49/4107-Pengembangan-Iptek-Dan-Pendidikan-Tinggi-Di-Era-Revolusi-Industri-40.Html
Nasir, M. 2018b. Menristekdikti: Tak Ada Dikotomi Dalam Rangka Mendukung Peningkatan Daya Saing Bangsa Era Industri 4.0. Biro Kerja Sama Dan Komunikasi Publik Kemenristekdikti. Https://Www.Ristekbrin.Go.Id/Menristekdikti-Tak-Ada-Dikotomi-Dalam-Rangka-Mendukung-Peningkatan-Daya-Saing-Bangsa-Era-Industri-4-0/
Nasir, M. (2018c). Menristekdikti: Perlu Reorientasi Kurikulum Untuk Meningkatkan Inovasi Perguruan Tinggi Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Biro Kerjasama Dan Komunikasi Publik Kemenristekdikti. Https://Www.Ristekbrin.Go.Id/Menristekdikti-Perlu-Reorientasi-Kurikulum-Untuk-Meningkatkan-Inovasi-Perguruan-Tinggi-Di-Era-Revolusi-Industri-4-0/
Nasir, M. 2019. Menristekdikti Minta Perguruan Tinggi Siap Akan Kemunculan Profesi Baru Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Biro Kerja Sama Dan Komunikasi Publik Kemenristekdikti. Https://Www.Ristekbrin.Go.Id/Menristekdikti-Minta-Perguruan-Tinggi-Siap-Akan-Kemunculan-Profesi-Baru-Di-Era-Revolusi-Industri-4-0/
Neely, A. 1998. Measuring Business Performance – Why, What, How. Economist Books. London.
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. 1995. Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083622
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common Method Biases In Behavioral Research: A Critical Review Of The Literature And Recommended Remedies. The Journal Of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. Https://Doi.Org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Porter, M. E. 1990. New Global Strategies for Competitive Advantage. Planning Review, 18(3), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054287
Podsakoff, P., & Organ, D. 1986. Self-Report In Organizational Research. Journal Of Management - J MANAGE, 12, 531–544. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/014920638601200408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
Santos-Rodrigues, H., Faria, J., Cranfield, D., & Morais, C. 2013. Intellectual Capital And Innovation: A Case Study Of A Public Healthcare Organisation In Europe. The Electronic Journal Of Knowledge Management, 11.
Shisia, A., Sang, W., Matoke, J., & Omwario, B. N. 2014. Strategic Innovation and Performance of Public Universities in Kenya. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(23).
Subramanian, A., & Nilakanta, S. 1996. Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance.
Omega, 24(6), 631–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(96)00031-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(96)00031-X
Sudlow, B. 2019. Review Of Joseph E. Aoun (2017). Robot Proof: Higher Education In The Age Of Artificial Intelligence. Postdigital Science And Education, 1(1), 236–239. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S42438-018-0005-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0005-8
Suwignjo, P. 2018, Januari 17. Kebijakan Kelembagaan Menghadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33489/mibj.v17i2.212
Tjahjadi, B., & Soewarno, N. 2015. Dampak Mediasi Market-Driven Costing Terhadap Hubungan Intensitas Persaingan Dan Karakteristik Pelanggan Dengan Kinerja Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 16(2), 102–112. Https://Doi.Org/10.9744/Jak.16.2.102-112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.16.2.102-112
Wang, X. 2010. Performance Measurement In Universities. Managerial Perspective. University Of Twente.
Zerenler, M., Hasiloglu, S. B., & Sezgin, M. 2008. Intellectual Capital And Innovation Performance: Empirical Evidence In The Turkish Automotive Supplier. Journal Of Technology Management & Innovation, 3, 31–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242008000200003
Copyright (c) 2022 Heri Widodo, Bambang Tjahjadi, Basuki Basuki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
