Understanding Institutional Influences on MSMEs' Environmental Accounting Adoption


  • (1) * Sukma Uli Nuha            Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik  
            Indonesia

  • (2)  Ria Meilan            Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Widya Gama Lumajang  
            Indonesia

  • (3)  Khalilov Bahromjon Bahodirovich             The Asian International University  
            Uzbekistan

    (*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

General Background: The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are a global agenda that demands the active involvement of all sectors, including micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). MSMEs make a significant contribution to economic growth; however, awareness and implementation of sustainability practices, particularly environmental accounting practices, remain relatively low. Specific Background: Previous studies have focused primarily on large companies, resulting in a limited understanding of the drivers (antecedents) of environmental accounting practices in MSMEs. Knowledge Gap: the need for a theoretical approach that can explain how institutional pressures (normative, coercive, and mimetic) can influence the environmental accounting behaviour of MSMEs. Objective: This study examines the antecedents of environmental accounting practices among MSME business actors to create a sustainable business. Methods: A qualitative approach was employed to analyze data on the direct and indirect drivers of the behavior of all MSMEs engaged in the food and beverage processing sector in East Java Province, as well as a sample of MSMEs in Lumajang District and Gresik District, to inform environmental accounting practices. Results: Provides empirical evidence on the direct and indirect drivers of the behaviour of ​​ MSMEs in ecological accounting practices. MSMEs in Indonesia achieve business sustainability through institutional mechanisms, driven by coercive, normative, and mimetic pressures. Novelty: This study explains the drivers of MSMEs' ​​ behaviour towards environmental accounting practices based on institutional theory mechanisms. Implication: This study suggests that MSMEs should adopt environmental accounting practices to promote sustainable development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abu Afifa, M. M., & Saleh, I. (2022). Management accounting systems effectiveness, perceived environmental uncertainty, and companies' performance: the case of Jordanian companies. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(2), 259–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-07-2020-2288

Afolabi, H., Ram, R., Hussainey, K., Nandy, M., & Lodh, S. (2023). Exploration of small and medium entities' actions on sustainability practices and their implications for a greener economy. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 24(4), 655–681. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-09-2022-0252

Ahmad, A. dkk. (2023). Merapah Akuntansi Hijau dalam Harmoni Pemikiran Perintis (Ala “Prilly Latuconsina) dan Industri Pusaka Lingkungan Jember menuju Green City. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi (JPAK), 11(3), 299 – 309. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpak.v11n3.p299-309

Altuzarra Artola, A. (2024). Does eco-innovation lead to company growth? Innovation & Management Review, 21(4), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-04-2023-0052

Amirya, Mirna dan Irianto, G. (2023). Tantangan Implementasi Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Peradaban, 9(1), 187 – 198. https://doi.org/10.24252/jiap.v9i1.38916

Appannan, J. S., Mohd Said, R., Ong, T. S., & Senik, R. (2023). Promoting sustainable development through strategies, environmental management accounting, and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1914–1930. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3227

Aydin, M., Sogut, Y., & Altundemir, M. E. (2023). Moving toward the sustainable environment of European Union countries: Investigating the effect of natural resources and green budgeting on environmental quality. Resources Policy, 83, 103737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103737

Cernev, T., & Fenner, R. (2020). The importance of achieving foundational Sustainable Development Goals in reducing global risk. Futures, 115, 102492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102726

Cho, C. H., Senn, J., & Sobkowiak, M. (2022). Sustainability at stake during COVID-19: Exploring the role of accounting in addressing environmental crises. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 82, 102327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102327

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: Pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran (Edisi keenam). Pustaka Pelajar.

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields. Advances in Strategic Management, 17(2), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17011-1

Dura, J., & Suharsono, R. (2022). Application of green accounting to sustainable development improve financial performance study in green industry. Jurnal Akuntansi, 26(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v26i2.893

Ebrahimi, S. M., & Koh, L. (2021). Manufacturing sustainability: Institutional theory and life cycle thinking. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126787

Indah Rakhma Ningtyas, H. (2024). The Meaning of Profit in Traditional Markets in the Framework of Understanding Manunggaling Kawula Lan Gusti. Journal of Accounting Science, 8(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v8i1.1772

Indriastuti, M., & Mutamimah, M. (2023). Green accounting and sustainable performance of micro, small, and medium enterprises: The role of financial performance as mediation. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 26(2), 249–272. http://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.691

Jędrzejczyk, W. (2021). Managing customer relations and value in organisations with the use of IT tools: customer segmentation on the market of eco-innovative services. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 2816–2825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.052

Kusumowardani, N., Tjahjono, B., Lazell, J., Bek, D., Theodorakopoulos, N., Andrikopoulos, P., & Priadi, C. R. (2022). A circular capability framework to address food waste and losses in the agri-food supply chain: The antecedents, principles and outcomes of circular economy. Journal of Business Research, 142, 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.020

Leal Filho, W., Lovren, V. O., Will, M., Salvia, A. L., & Frankenberger, F. (2021). Poverty: A central barrier to the implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Environmental Science & Policy, 125, 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.020

Meilan, R., Ekmarinda, E. Y., & Hakim, I. (2023). Profitability as a Moderator in the Implementation of Environmental Management Accounting for Corporate Sustainability. Wiga: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ekonomi, 13(2), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.30741/wiga.v13i2.1113

Moleong, L. J. (2010). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nabila, Rifda dan Arinta, Y. (2021). Green Accounting for Sustainable Development: Case Study of Indonesia's Manufacturing Sector. Akuntansi Dewantara, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.26460/ad.v5i1.9147

Ningrum, L., Nooraeni, R., Berliana, S. M., & Sari, L. K. (2024). Association of SDG Indicators of the Social Development Pillar in Indonesia using the Apriori Algorithm. Procedia Computer Science, 245, 450–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.10.271

Nuha, S. U., Cahyaningati, R., & Meilan, R. (2023). Application of Green Accounting in Islamic Perspective and its Impact on a Company's Financial Performance. Assets: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Akuntansi, Keuangan Dan Pajak, 7(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.30741/assets.v7i2.1070

Ong, J. H., Khatibi, A., Mohd Talib, Z., & George, R. A. (2025). Ethical leadership in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) adoption for Malaysian micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). International Journal of Ethics and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-08-2024-0266

Oti‑Sarpong, K., Shojaei, R. S., Dakhli, Z., Burgess, G., & Zaki, M. (2022). How countries achieve greater use of off‑site manufacturing to build new housing: Identifying typologies through institutional theory. Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103403

Pramasita, S. E., Baridwan, Z., & Nurofik. (2022). Akuntansi Lingkungan dalam Pengungkapan Simbolik dan Substantif. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 13(1), 85-94. https:// doi.org/10.21776/ ub.jamal.2021.13.1.07

Putrika, U. (2025). How Green Investment Affects Stock Returns : Exploring the Role of Financial Performance. 9(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v9i1.1938

Rudko, I., Bashirpour Bonab, A., Fedele, M., & Formisano, A. V. (2025). New institutional theory and AI: toward rethinking artificial intelligence in organisations. Journal of Management History, 31(2), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-09-2023-0097

Saeed, A., Jun, Y., Nubuor, S. A., Priyankara, H. P. R., & Jayasuriya, M. P. F. (2018). Institutional pressures, green supply chain management practices on environmental and economic performance: A two-theory view. Sustainability, 10(5), 1517. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051517

Saifurrahman, A., & Kassim, S. H. (2024). Regulatory issues inhibiting the financial inclusion: a case study among Islamic banks and MSMEs in Indonesia. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 16(4), 589–617. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-05-2022-0086

Salim, M. N., Abd Rahman, N. H., Susilastuti, D., Wibowo, E. W., Marlapa, E., & Abd Samad, K. (2024). Application of MSME and Green Economy Principles for Sustainability in Indonesia and Malaysia. Tec Empresarial, 19(1), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v19i1.370

Scarpellini, S., Marín-Vinuesa, L. M., Aranda-Usón, A., & Portillo-Tarragona, P. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and environmental accounting for the circular economy in businesses. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(7), 1129–1158. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2019-0150

Seth, D., Rehman, M. A. A., & Shrivastava, R. L. (2018). Green manufacturing drivers and their relationships for small and medium (SME) and large industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 1381–1405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.106

Soesanto, S. (2020). Akuntansi Lingkungan menuju Ekonomi Hijau Perspektif Relasi Natural Suistanibility dengan Keberlanjutan Bisnis. Account; Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangn Dan Perbankan, 9(1), 1581 – 1589. https://doi.org/10.32722/acc.v9i1.4580

Susilo, S., & Mulyani, S. (2024). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Jenggala Pustaka Utama.

Tiba, S. (2023). Unlocking the poverty and hunger puzzle: Toward democratising the natural resources for accomplishing SDGs 1&2. Resources Policy, 82, 103516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103516

Tisna, R. D. A., Diana, N., & Afifudin, A. (2020). Pengaruh Penerapan Green Accounting terhadap Profitabilitas Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2015-2018. E_Jurnal Ilmiah Riset Akuntansi, 9(01).17-28.https://jim.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jra/article/view/7435

Verma, S., & Kandpal, D. (2021). Green economy and sustainable development: A macroeconomic perspective. In Environmental sustainability and economy (pp. 325–343). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822188-4.00016-6

Wibowo, A. (2022). Model bisnis ramah lingkungan (Green business). Penerbit Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik. https://penerbit.stekom.ac.id/index.php/yayasanpat/article/view/314

Published
2025-07-28
 
How to Cite
Sukma Uli Nuha, Ria Meilan, & Bahodirovich , K. B. (2025). Understanding Institutional Influences on MSMEs’ Environmental Accounting Adoption. Journal of Accounting Science, 9(2), 314-324. https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v9i2.1921
Section
Management Accounting