Acceptance of Accounting Information System of Cooperative  Laboratory

Carolina Lita Permatasari; Dwi Iga Luhsasi

doi:10.21070/jas.v9i2.1973

(1) * Carolina Lita Permatasari Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Indonesia
(2) Dwi Iga Luhsasi Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v9i2.1973

Abstract

General Background: Accounting information system is an important tool for profit and non-profit organisations, which supports the preparation of financial statements that are critical for managerial decision making. Specific Background: In the domain of behavioural accounting, the emphasis is not only on recording financial transactions but also on understanding how human behaviour affects the interpretation and utilisation of accounting information. Knowledge Gaps: Previous research has identified limited or insignificant effects of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness on users' interest and intensity in using accounting information systems, indicating a gap in understanding system adoption behaviour. Objective: This study aims to examine the influence of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude towards use, and intensity of use on the actual use of co-operative accounting information systems, and to assess user acceptance of such systems in financial reporting. Methods: This study used a quantitative approach with path analysis to evaluate the hypothesised relationships. Results: The findings showed significant positive effects among most of the variables, except for the insignificant effect of perceived ease of use on usage intensity. Novelty: This challenges the basic tenet of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which states that ease of use should drive usage behaviour. Implications: Improving perceived usefulness should be prioritised over simplicity to increase system adoption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ajzen, Icek. (2005). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process: The Theory of Planned Behavior. http://home.comcast.net/~aizen/tpb.obhdp.pdf-295, (diakses 10 Juli 2023).

Alharbi, Saleh. (2014). Using the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding Academics’ Behavioural Intention to Use Learning Management System. (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2014.050120

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Ed Revisi. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Ashari. (2025). Accrual Accounting Compliance Drivers: An Indonesian Public Sector Study. Journal of Accounting Science, 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v9i1.1931.

Azwar, S. (2014). Reliabilitas dan Validitas Edisi 4th. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Chawla, D. & Joshi, H. (2019). Consumer attitude and intention to adopt mobile wallet in India – An empirical study. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37 (7): 1590-1618. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-09-2018-0256.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.

Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Examine Faculty Use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) In Higher Education Institutions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11 (2). Available from: http://jolt.merlot.org/Vol11no2/Fathema_0615.pdf

Fatmawati, Endang. (2015). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Untuk Menganalisis Penerimaan Terhadap Sistem Informasi Perpustakaan. Jurnal Iqra’ Open Academic Journals Index, 9 (1).

Ferdinand, Augusty. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling dalam Penelitian Manajemen. Semarang: FE UNDIP.

Garson, David. (2003). Aplikasi Amos. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Utama.

Ghozali, Imam. (2015). Model Persamaan Struktural Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan Program AMOS Ver. 16.0. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.

Granic, Andrina & Marangunic, Nikola. (2019). Technology Acceptance Model In Educational Context: A Systematic Literature Review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50 (5): 2572-2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864.

Hardini & Oktavianto. (2025). Forecasting Capabilities in Blockchain Data Networks: Trends from Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Accounting Science, 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v9i1.1828.

Hasan & Lestari. (2024). Exploring the Interconnection: Employee Diff, Board Gender Diversity, and Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting Science, 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v8i2.1811.

Hermawan, S & Biduri, S. (2019). Akuntansi Perilaku. Sidoarjo: UMSIDA Press.

Ho, H. P. C., Nguyen, T. K., & Trinh, C. D. (2025). Intentions of accounting students: a study on professional accounting in Vietnam. Accounting Education, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2025.2487480.

Jiang, Jin., Lu, Xiangyun., Xiao, Jason., & Ye, Rui. (2025). Hedging, Hedge Accounting, and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China. The International Journal of Accounting. 2543001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1094406025430012.

Jogiyanto. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian Sistem Informasi. Yogyakarta: CV Andi Offset.

Kristiana, I., Erlangga, E. P., & Sinarasri, A. (2024). The Influence of Implementting Government Accounting Standars Based on Competence With The Use of Accounting Information Sytems as a Moderation Variable. Journal of Accounting Science, 8(1), 72 - 87. https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v8i1.1748.

Khomsiyah. (2017). Perkembangan Akuntansi Keperilakuan dan Dampaknya Pada Penelitian Akuntansi di Indonesia. Jurnal Media Riset, Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi. 1 (1): 73. https://doi.org/10.25105/mraai.v1i1.1761.

Kuei-Fu Li, Yi-Ping Liao. (2024). Does the Expanded Audit Report Enhance the Efficient Use of Accounting Information? Journal of International Accounting Research 1 November 2024; 23 (3): 99–124. https://doi.org/10.2308/JIAR-2023-031.

Lubberink, Martien. (2025). Bank Accounting, Bank Regulation, and Capital Requirements: A Review. The International Journal of Accounting 2530001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1094406025300011.

Lubis, A. I. (2018). Akuntansi Keperilakuan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Lucyanda, Jurica. (2010). Pengujian Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) dan Theory Planned Behavior (TPB). JRAK, 2: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.33558/jrak.v1i2.124

Lule, I., Omwansa, T. K., & Waema, T. M. (2012). Application of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in M-Banking Adoption in Kenya. International Journal of Computing and ICT Research, 6 (1): 31-43.

Muhibbin, Syah. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan Dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Narimawati & Sarwono. (2007). Structure Equational Model (SEM) dalam Riset Ekonomi menggunakan LISREL. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Ningdiyah, Asyik & Fidiana. (2024). The Impact of Digital Integrated Reporting onthe Influence of Financial Performance on Firm Value. Journal of Accounting Science, 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v8i2.1866.

Orazalin, Nurlan S., Ntim, Collin G., & Malagila, John K. (2025). Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2024.100669.

Permatasari, C.L., Yanto, H., & Widiyanto. (2016). Penerimaan Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan Oleh Pengelola Keuangan Yayasan Pendidikan: Analisis Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Economic Education. 5 (1): 90-99.

Permatasari, C.L., & Prajanti, S.D.W. (2018). Acceptance of Financial Information System at School: Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Economic Education. 7 (2):109-120. https://doi.org/10.15294/JEEC.V7I2.27182.

Permatasari, C.L., & Luhsasi, D.I. (2022). Development of Non-Profit Accounting Information Systems. Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi. 22 (2): 191-212. https://doi.org/10.25105/mraai.v22i2.14851.

Rahmawati, R.N., & Narsa, I.M. (2019). Penggunaan E-Learning dengan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan. 6 (2): 127-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v6i2.26232.

Renny., Guritno, S., & Siringoringo, H. (2013). Perceived Usefulness, Ease to Use, and Attitude Towards Online Shopping Usefulness Towards Online Airlane Ticket Purchase. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 81:212-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.415.

Rosyida, Susy. (2017). Technology Acceptance Model Terhadap Penggunaan Internet dalam Berbelanja Online. Jurnal Sistem Informasi STMIK Antar Bangsa. 6 (2): 81-86.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Surendran, P. (2012). Technology Acceptance Model: A Survey of Literature. International Journal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR). 2 (4): 175-178. https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v2i4.161

Tsai, Chung-Hung. (2014). Integrating Social Capital Theory, Social Cognitive Theory, and the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore a Behavioral Model of Telehealth Systems. International Journal of Environmental Research an Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110504905.

Wijaya, S. W. (2006). Kajian teoritis Technology Acceptance Model sebagai model pendekatan untuk menentukan strategi mendorong kemauan pengguna dalam menggunakan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Sistem Informasi, Yogyakarta.

Yanto, H., Handayani, B. D., Solikhah, B., & Mulia, J. M. (2016). The behaviour of Indonesian SMEs in accepting Financial Accounting Standards without Public Accountability. International Journal of Business and Management Science, 6(1), 1–17. Retrieved from https://www.thefreelibrary.com/The+behavior+of+Indonesian+SMEs+in+accepting+Financial+Accounting...-a0502121282